Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove some deprecated HIR visitation functions #31146

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

ggevay
Copy link
Contributor

@ggevay ggevay commented Jan 22, 2025

The Visit trait is the way to do visitations nowadays. MIR is already using it everywhere (except where it has a hand-rolled traversal), but HIR still has a lot of old visitation code. This PR removes some of it.

(There is plenty deprecated HIR visitation code left. We could probably easily remove a lot more, I just wanted to wrap this up for today. There is also some HIR visitation code that will be harder to remove, because of having meaningful extra functionality compared to the Visit trait, such as keeping track of subquery nesting depth while doing the visitation.)

Motivation

  • This PR refactors existing code to remove deprecated code.

Tips for reviewer

A lot of the change is just whitespace, due to having to add Ok(()) after some match clauses, where the match used to be the only thing in a closure, but now it has to be surrounded by braces.

Individual commits are more digestible, but it might also make sense to just look at the whole PR.

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@ggevay ggevay added A-ADAPTER Topics related to the ADAPTER layer A-CLUSTER Topics related to the CLUSTER layer labels Jan 22, 2025
@ggevay ggevay requested review from a team as code owners January 22, 2025 15:52
@ggevay ggevay requested a review from aljoscha January 22, 2025 15:52
@ggevay ggevay enabled auto-merge January 22, 2025 16:29
@ggevay ggevay merged commit 52ffcad into MaterializeInc:main Jan 22, 2025
79 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-ADAPTER Topics related to the ADAPTER layer A-CLUSTER Topics related to the CLUSTER layer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants