Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(mt3dms-p01): advection scheme was not behaving as expected #251

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

langevin-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

For the problem ex-gwt-mt3dms-p01, the text indicated that TVD was used to represent all four cases of this problem. The problem was actually using the upstream scheme for both mf6 and mt3dms. The description was modified to accurately reflect the scheme used for the problem.

Copy link
Contributor

@emorway-usgs emorway-usgs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me. I just updated my version of ruff to 0.9...I was pretty far behind (ver. 0.5). The only thing I can think of is whether or not a note is needed in the release notes of MF6 indicating the description was updated - though I'm guessing that's not necessary.

@langevin-usgs langevin-usgs merged commit fe91c7f into MODFLOW-USGS:develop Jan 13, 2025
10 checks passed
@langevin-usgs langevin-usgs deleted the fix-mt3dmsp01 branch January 15, 2025 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants