Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Remove old security policy #8419

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

lena-larionova
Copy link
Contributor

Description

We have two contradictory copies of the vulnerability update policy for Kong Gateway.

One was supposed to be removed in 3.4, however it was only removed from the 3.4 nav file and not from 3.5 onward. There was already a 3.5 release branch at that time, which wasn't updated and caused us to end up with duplicate policies. See #6000

Testing instructions

Preview link:

Checklist

@lena-larionova lena-larionova added the review:general Review for general accuracy and presentation. Does the doc work? Does it output correctly? label Feb 10, 2025
@lena-larionova lena-larionova requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 19:04
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Deploy Preview for kongdocs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0676f28
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kongdocs/deploys/67aa4dd34cc5860008552ca7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8419--kongdocs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
9 paths audited
Performance: 93 (🟢 up 2 from production)
Accessibility: 92 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 98 (🟢 up 8 from production)
SEO: 99 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@lena-larionova lena-larionova merged commit 7426498 into main Feb 10, 2025
22 checks passed
@lena-larionova lena-larionova deleted the fix/remove-old-vulnerability-policy branch February 10, 2025 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review:general Review for general accuracy and presentation. Does the doc work? Does it output correctly?
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants