Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Key Sets rename in API spec #8393

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Key Sets rename in API spec #8393

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

Guaris
Copy link
Contributor

@Guaris Guaris commented Jan 30, 2025

I only did 3.9, I hope to generate the rest of them.

@Guaris Guaris added the review:general Review for general accuracy and presentation. Does the doc work? Does it output correctly? label Jan 30, 2025
@Guaris Guaris requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2025 17:12
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for kongdocs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fef81ce
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kongdocs/deploys/679bb35df32d4e0008e0e4d5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8393--kongdocs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
9 paths audited
Performance: 84 (🟢 up 2 from production)
Accessibility: 92 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 98 (🟢 up 8 from production)
SEO: 98 (🔴 down 1 from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@Guaris Guaris merged commit 7710973 into main Jan 30, 2025
16 checks passed
@Guaris Guaris deleted the key-sets branch January 30, 2025 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review:general Review for general accuracy and presentation. Does the doc work? Does it output correctly?
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants