You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's very interesting and inspiring work! I have a short question about the data private labels for two dataset. When I visualize the private labels, I found that the index value for Yale is from 0 to 6 ([0,1,2,3,4,5,6]) and for Rochester is from 0 to 2 ([0,1,2]). So, I thought the classes of these two dataset are supposed to be 7 and 3 rather than 6 and 2. I can see the operation in process_attri.py on labels, but I didn't see why. Could you please give more details about that, thank you so much!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am also confused about this question. I have read the 'readme.txt' file of these datasets, and I found that the missing data is coded '0'. refer to this url
I think the authors may want to eliminate the zero items in the data, but I can't understand the operations in process_attri.py.
It's very interesting and inspiring work! I have a short question about the data private labels for two dataset. When I visualize the private labels, I found that the index value for Yale is from 0 to 6 ([0,1,2,3,4,5,6]) and for Rochester is from 0 to 2 ([0,1,2]). So, I thought the classes of these two dataset are supposed to be 7 and 3 rather than 6 and 2. I can see the operation in process_attri.py on labels, but I didn't see why. Could you please give more details about that, thank you so much!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: