Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v3.17.5 #309

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

juul-mobile-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) dependencies patch 3.17.4 -> 3.17.5

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v3.17.5

Fixed
  • SpotBugs-annotations dependency is suddenly needed in builds that do certain kinds of annotation processing. (Issue 1026)
  • Significant fields error when testing a class with a field that has a Map with an array as its value type. (Issue 1027)
Changed
  • Reverted the refactorings introduced in versions 3.17.2, 3.17.3 and 3.17.4, as they were causing more problems than they were solving. See this blog post for some background.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@twyatt twyatt enabled auto-merge (squash) December 15, 2024 06:38
@twyatt twyatt merged commit 5bf1d5e into main Dec 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@twyatt twyatt deleted the renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-3.x branch December 16, 2024 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants