Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Split Cardano.CLI.Compatible.Transaction into separate modules #1067

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

carbolymer
Copy link
Contributor

@carbolymer carbolymer commented Feb 13, 2025

Changelog

- description: |
    Splits `Cardano.CLI.Compatible.Transaction` into separate modules aligning with cardano-cli design.

# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  - refactoring    # QoL changes
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  # - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

This PR splits Cardano.CLI.Compatible.Transaction into separate modules aligning with cardano-cli design.

There are no changes to the code - only stuff moved around.

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. See Running tests for more details
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/refactor/split-compat-tx-module branch from d59a926 to 332b3a0 Compare February 13, 2025 17:06
@carbolymer carbolymer self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
@carbolymer carbolymer marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 17:07
@carbolymer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #1071

@carbolymer carbolymer closed this Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant