Update PacketRusher's config.yml #243
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Format of PacketRusher's configuration has been modified in a non backward-compatible way to support multiples AMF (and load balance traffic to multiple AMF using TNL associations). Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks for using PacketRusher! :-)
avrodriguezgrad
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2024
|
Hi @linouxis9 Thanks for updating the image and helping us to keep the repo up to date! You were faster than me ;) BR, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Format of PacketRusher's configuration has been modified in a non backward-compatible way to support multiples AMF (and load balance traffic to multiple AMF using TNL associations).
Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks for using PacketRusher! :-)
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
No, the entrypoint hides the change.
Does this PR introduce new external dependencies?
It updates PacketRusher image's commit to the one with the breaking change.
Additional documentation: