-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #842 from GSA/feature/RITM1283329
Feature/ritm1283329
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
58 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: post | ||
title: 'AI in Action: 5 Essential Findings from the 2024 Federal AI Use Case Inventory' | ||
excerpt: 'This year, agencies publicly reported more than 1,700 ways they are using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to advance their missions and deliver better experiences to the public.' | ||
date: 15 January 2025 | ||
display-date: 15 January 2025 | ||
author: Clare Martorana, Federal CIO | ||
tags: Artificial-Intelligence policy AI | ||
permalink: /ai-in-action/ | ||
--- | ||
This year, agencies publicly reported more than 1,700 ways they are using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to advance their missions and deliver better experiences to the public. While the full listing of use cases is available [here](https://www.cio.gov/policies-and-priorities/Executive-Order-13960-AI-Use-Case-Inventories-Reference/){:target="_blank"}, I want to highlight five key takeaways you need to know: | ||
|
||
**1. Compared to 2023, Federal agencies have more than doubled their AI use in the last year, citing improvements to operational efficiency and the execution of their missions as key drivers for increased utilization.** | ||
|
||
In this cycle of reporting, 37 agencies are sharing how they are developing and using AI. Collectively, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of the Interior (DOI) account for __50%__ of this year’s publicly-reported AI use cases. | ||
|
||
While agencies cite a host of expected benefits from their AI use, some common themes include: enhanced anomaly detection, streamlined business processes, and improved decision-making. | ||
|
||
**2. Federal agencies are predominantly leveraging AI to assist with administrative and IT functions; however, AI use cases in health and medical applications closely follow.** | ||
|
||
__Roughly 46%__ of AI use cases across the Federal government are categorized as __mission-enabling__, which includes management of finances, human resources, and facilities and properties. This category also captures agency cybersecurity, IT, procurement, and other administrative functions. | ||
|
||
As reflected in this year’s inventory: | ||
- The Department of Labor (DOL) is using an AI assistant to help answer common procurement or specific contract questions. | ||
- The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is using AI to assist examiners with finding relevant documents to help search and adjudicate new patent applications. | ||
|
||
Additionally, __approximately 13%__ of use cases are categorized under __health and medical__, followed by __roughly 9% of use cases supporting government services or benefits delivery__, which covers processing and improving access for government benefits (such as Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security, and unemployment). | ||
|
||
Additional use cases include: | ||
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using AI to accelerate their investigations of multi-state foodborne disease outbreaks that otherwise requires extensive time and human effort. | ||
- The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) protecting veterans’ benefit payments by using AI to help detect fraudulent direct deposit changes. | ||
- The Social Security Administration (SSA) using AI to support Disability Program adjudicators in maximizing the quality, speed, and consistency of their decision-making. | ||
|
||
Other areas of application include law and justice, education and workforce, transportation, science and space, and energy and the environment. Furthermore, __more than 100 use cases__ directly support [High Impact Service Providers](https://www.performance.gov/cx/hisps/){:target="_blank"} (HISPs) – including at the Veterans Benefits Administration, the Public Experience Portfolio at General Services Administration, and the Social Security Administration. | ||
|
||
**3. Approximately 50% of all reported AI use cases are developed in-house, illustrating Federal agencies’ capacity for innovation.** | ||
|
||
In an effort to increase public transparency into agencies’ procurement and development processes, we’ve expanded this year’s inventory to link use cases to specific agency contracts and solicitations, including whether a use case involves custom-developed and/or publicly available code. __Over 40%__ of use cases include custom-developed code, much of which is publicly available, inviting innovation and continued collaboration across the Federal ecosystem. | ||
|
||
Federal agencies are leveraging both internal expertise and external partnerships to integrate AI into their operations at relatively proportional rates, which ensures the government can innovate and adapt AI technologies according to its specific needs. | ||
|
||
**4. Federal agencies are showcasing increased AI maturity, including by accelerating access to necessary tools and infrastructures for development.** | ||
|
||
For AI currently __in operation__ within an agency: | ||
- Agencies are developing comprehensive documentation for their AI use cases outlining appropriateness of data for analysis and decision-making. | ||
- __Over 35%__ of the AI is developed on existing enterprise data and analytics platforms within an agency or re-use production-level code and/or data from a different use case. | ||
|
||
The above figures demonstrate agencies’ agility and efficiency in leveraging AI for scalable and impactful solutions. | ||
|
||
**5. Approximately 13% of Federal AI use cases could impact the public’s rights or safety, as defined by [OMB Memorandum M-24-10](https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/M-24-10-Advancing-Governance-Innovation-and-Risk-Management-for-Agency-Use-of-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf){:target="_blank"}.** | ||
|
||
For these use cases, agencies are required to implement concrete safeguards before use. The inventory provides visibility into agency approaches to AI risk management, which include a range of actions to reliably assess, test, and monitor AI’s impacts on the public and mitigate the risks of algorithmic discrimination. | ||
|
||
For example, as of December 16, 2024, agencies have completed AI Impact Assessments for __more than 80%__ of rights- and/or safety-impacting use cases and independent evaluations of __more than 70%__ of such use cases. Additionally, __nearly half__ of rights-impacting use cases have an established process in place to appeal or contest an AI system’s outcome and/or opt-out from the AI functionality in favor of a human alternative. | ||
|
||
In select cases, OMB granted extensions to agencies that requested additional time to implement the required safeguards. Additional information on these extensions can be found on [cio.gov](https://www.cio.gov/policies-and-priorities/Executive-Order-13960-AI-Use-Case-Inventories-Reference/){:target="_blank"}. | ||
|
||
The Federal Government continues to lead the world in the safe and responsible use of AI. To read more about all the ways Federal agencies are using AI and implementing concrete safeguards to protect the public’s rights and safety while doing so, view the full listing of use cases [here](https://github.com/ombegov/2024-Federal-AI-Use-Case-Inventory){:target="_blank"}. |