Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ScalarFieldBH example update #263

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

ScalarFieldBH example update #263

merged 11 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

KAClough
Copy link
Member

@KAClough KAClough commented Dec 2, 2024

This PR will update the ScalarField example to ScalarFieldBH, where the initial data is analytic for a constant scalar field profile around a Schwarzschild BH. This allows us to set G_Newton =1 as should be the case!

This should also allow us to read in data from the corresponding example in GRTresna (the initial conditions code that is about to be released) and plot the constraint violations to easily allow convergence testing.

I haven't fully tested yet hence the draft state.

@KAClough KAClough self-assigned this Dec 2, 2024
@KAClough KAClough added the enhancement Modification of existing feature/general improvement label Dec 2, 2024
@KAClough KAClough marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 19:16
@KAClough
Copy link
Member Author

KAClough commented Dec 2, 2024

This is mostly done now - we just need to check that it works with the ICSolver. I should probably rename the files to ScalarFieldBH to be consistent with @AreefW 's cosmo example. My python plot file for the Ham could also be improved, but let's just see if it works first...

@KAClough
Copy link
Member Author

KAClough commented Dec 6, 2024

Ok, this should now be good to go I think. @SamuelBrady can you provide an independent review to check that it works ok for both the restart and running from the analytic data? If so we should merge it. @AreefW can you update your example to have the same format for restarting from GRTresna?

@SamuelBrady SamuelBrady force-pushed the feature/initial_conditions branch from 3f51637 to af8a78b Compare January 7, 2025 14:33
Copy link
Contributor

@SamuelBrady SamuelBrady left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks good, and new convergence tests work well

@SamuelBrady SamuelBrady merged commit d1c4489 into main Jan 7, 2025
47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Modification of existing feature/general improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants