v4.1.0

[Frix-x]

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request refactors the belt comparison plotting functions to use PSD data directly from SignalData objects, introduces re-interpolation of PSD signals to a common frequency range, and replaces the R² similarity calculation with the Pearson correlation coefficient for improved stability. Additionally, it adjusts the display properties of the 'Accel per Hz used' title line.

• Enhancements:
  • Refactored the plot_versus_belts function to use PSD data directly from the SignalData objects instead of interpolated PSD arrays.
  • Updated the compute_signal_data function to include re-interpolation of the PSD signal to a common frequency range.
  • Replaced the R² calculation with the Pearson correlation coefficient for computing the similarity between two belts, improving stability.
  • Adjusted the font size and position of the 'Accel per Hz used' title line in the belts_calibration function.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request refactors the PSD data handling in the belts graph creator by removing interpolation steps and simplifying the peak plotting logic. The similarity calculation method has been updated to use the Pearson correlation coefficient instead of R². Additionally, minor adjustments were made to the title text position and font size in the belts_calibration function.

File-Level Changes

Files	Changes
shaketune/graph_creators/belts_graph_creator.py	Refactored PSD data handling by removing interpolation steps and simplifying peak plotting logic. Updated similarity calculation method to use Pearson correlation coefficient.

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Frix-x - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}