-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#1016 Migrated INCR
commands
#1141
Conversation
Hi, Thank you for making these changes. Please add integration tests in resp, http and websocket folder. Additionally, please audit and update documentation for all the migrated commands. If this PR is still in progress, you could mark it as Edit: lint check is failing, please check. Please reach out to me or anyone on the discord community if you have any questions. Thanks |
Have added a new error to make the
Have also added documentation for |
@apoorvyadav1111 can you pre-review this if i need to do any changes. |
Hi @pg30 , I have checked the changes as per the checklist. I see that we are still having tests in async folder. We can migrate them to resp folder, (please use any existing test file in resp folder as reference). Additionally, we need to add tests in websocket folder too. I will look at the changes thoroughly once it checks off everything and is ready for review. Thanks |
hi @pg30 you can use ErrGeneral for the error if it's not getting used at multiple evals, no need to create a separate error for this usecase. Thanks |
Thanks for the feedback @apoorvyadav1111 @AshwinKul28 |
@AshwinKul28 can you review this pls |
@AshwinKul28 Http and Websockets integration tests in the PR involving big integers like math.MaxInt64 and math.MinInt64 are functionally working but not logically correct due to #1163 . |
Hey @pg30 Thanks a lot for this commendable effort. Changes looks good. Please verify all the docs changes once whether they are aligned with the ideal document - https://github.com/DiceDB/dice/blob/master/docs/sample_command_docs.md You can include best practices, and additional notes if required in each of these docs. Otherwise, the changes look great. Once docs changes are confirmed will merge the PR. |
@AshwinKul28 Thanks for reviewing the changes. I have added alternatives section for the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. LGTM
Closes #1016