Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CSM Agentless Read Endpoint #2165

Merged

Conversation

api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

}

if attributes.key?(:'data')
if (value = attributes[:'data']).is_a?(Array)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Consider using Array() to ensure the type is that of an array (...read more)

The rule "Use Array() to ensure your variable is an array" is important for ensuring your code behaves as expected, regardless of the type of data it receives. It is common in Ruby to need to iterate through an array of items. However, if the variable is not an array, this can lead to unexpected behavior or errors.

The Array() method in Ruby is a Kernel method that converts its argument to an Array. If the argument is already an Array, it returns the argument. If the argument is nil, it returns an empty Array. This can be used to ensure that a variable is an array before trying to iterate over it, preventing potential errors or unexpected behavior.

By using Array(foos), you can ensure that foos is an array before you try to iterate over it with each. This prevents the need to check if foos is an array with foos.is_a?(Array) and makes your code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

# Get AWS Scan Options.
#
# @see #list_aws_scan_options_with_http_info
def list_aws_scan_options(opts = {})

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Avoid using a hash as an optional parameter (...read more)

The rule "Avoid hash optional parameters" is a guideline that encourages developers to explicitly declare parameters instead of using a hash for optional parameters. This is because using a hash for optional parameters can make the code harder to understand and maintain. It can also lead to unexpected behavior if a developer accidentally includes a key in the hash that the method does not expect.

This rule is important because it promotes code readability and maintainability. It also helps prevent potential bugs that may occur due to unexpected keys in the optional hash. By explicitly declaring each parameter, developers can easily see what parameters a method expects, making the code easier to read and understand.

To adhere to this rule, instead of using a hash for optional parameters, explicitly declare each parameter in the method definition. For example, instead of using options = {} in the method definition, declare each parameter like name, email, age. This way, anyone reading the code can easily understand what parameters the method expects and in what order.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

#
# @param opts [Hash] the optional parameters
# @return [Array<(AwsScanOptionsResponse, Integer, Hash)>] AwsScanOptionsResponse data, response status code and response headers
def list_aws_scan_options_with_http_info(opts = {})

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Avoid using a hash as an optional parameter (...read more)

The rule "Avoid hash optional parameters" is a guideline that encourages developers to explicitly declare parameters instead of using a hash for optional parameters. This is because using a hash for optional parameters can make the code harder to understand and maintain. It can also lead to unexpected behavior if a developer accidentally includes a key in the hash that the method does not expect.

This rule is important because it promotes code readability and maintainability. It also helps prevent potential bugs that may occur due to unexpected keys in the optional hash. By explicitly declaring each parameter, developers can easily see what parameters a method expects, making the code easier to read and understand.

To adhere to this rule, instead of using a hash for optional parameters, explicitly declare each parameter in the method definition. For example, instead of using options = {} in the method definition, declare each parameter like name, email, age. This way, anyone reading the code can easily understand what parameters the method expects and in what order.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation


require "datadog_api_client"
api_instance = DatadogAPIClient::V2::CSMAgentsAPI.new
p api_instance.list_aws_scan_options()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Suggested change
p api_instance.list_aws_scan_options()
p api_instance.list_aws_scan_options
Do not use parentheses with methods that take no arguments (...read more)

The rule "Avoid parentheses when methods take no arguments" is part of the Ruby style guide. It suggests that when a method takes no arguments, you should not use parentheses. This is because the use of parentheses in such a case is redundant and unnecessary, and it can make your code more difficult to read and understand.

This rule is important because it promotes cleaner, more readable code. In Ruby, clean and readable code is highly valued. By following this rule, you can ensure your code is easier to understand and maintain, which is crucial for long-term project success.

To adhere to this rule, remove the parentheses when calling a method that does not require any arguments. For example, instead of writing 'test'.upcase(), you should write 'test'.upcase. Similarly, instead of Kernel.exit!(), write Kernel.exit!. However, note that there is an exception for super - super by itself is different from super(), so in this case, parentheses may be necessary.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

return_type = opts[:debug_return_type] || 'AwsScanOptionsResponse'

# auth_names
auth_names = opts[:debug_auth_names] || [:apiKeyAuth, :appKeyAuth]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Suggested change
auth_names = opts[:debug_auth_names] || [:apiKeyAuth, :appKeyAuth]
auth_names = opts[:debug_auth_names] || %i[apiKeyAuth appKeyAuth]
Consider using the %i syntax instead (...read more)

The rule "Prefer %i to the literal array syntax" is a guideline that encourages the use of the %i syntax for arrays of symbols. This is a part of the Ruby style guide that aims to promote conciseness and readability.

Symbols are immutable, reusable objects often used in Ruby instead of strings when the value does not need to be changed. When declaring an array of symbols, using the %i syntax can make your code cleaner and easier to read.

To adhere to this rule, instead of declaring an array of symbols using the literal array syntax like [:foo, :bar, :baz], use the %i syntax like %i[foo bar baz]. It's a good practice to consistently use %i for arrays of symbols as it enhances code readability and maintainability.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

# header parameters
header_params = opts[:header_params] || {}
# HTTP header 'Accept' (if needed)
header_params['Accept'] = @api_client.select_header_accept(['application/json'])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Suggested change
header_params['Accept'] = @api_client.select_header_accept(['application/json'])
header_params['Accept'] = @api_client.select_header_accept(%w[application/json])
Consider using the %w syntax instead (...read more)

The rule "Prefer %w to the literal array syntax" is a Ruby style guideline that encourages the use of %w notation instead of the traditional array syntax when defining arrays of strings. This rule is part of the Ruby community's efforts to promote readability and simplicity in Ruby code.

This rule is important because it helps to keep the code concise and easy to read. The %w notation allows you to define an array of strings without having to use quotes and commas. This can make the code cleaner and easier to understand, especially when dealing with large arrays.

To follow this rule, replace the traditional array syntax with the %w notation. For example, instead of writing ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'], you should write %w[foo bar baz]. This will create the same array, but in a more readable and concise way. By following this rule, you can help to make your Ruby code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3430 branch from 579640d to 24671a6 Compare December 18, 2024 15:53
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3430 branch 2 times, most recently from bbc236d to 03c416b Compare December 19, 2024 11:46
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3430 branch from 03c416b to 1c031ac Compare January 8, 2025 14:02
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot merged commit 568e217 into master Jan 8, 2025
14 checks passed
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot deleted the datadog-api-spec/generated/3430 branch January 8, 2025 20:06
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant