-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support chains with no gRPC & with BLS keys #43
Merged
+79
−23
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c87f9bd
Support chains with no gRPC & with BLS keys
DavidVentura da88d24
Remove berachain-specific hack on chain provider
DavidVentura 3d57402
Read network name identifier from config instead of gRPC
DavidVentura 5966e50
add note on custom GetStatus
DavidVentura 510dd4f
parse vp and blockheight as numbers from json
DavidVentura 6fd6519
remove extra Result in type
DavidVentura File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0/5 i preferred the previous struct layout more because it more closely resembled to what we had in the tmrpc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with the Result wrapper? i removed it because it "leaks" to the caller
i was even thinking of keeping the return value of Status() the same, and casting from this StatusResponse to tm.StatusResponse, so that when we can delete this code, no callers change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would the cast work? i think it's very strict, also when it comes to struct tags. if not you can just write a converter function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right, i meant a manual "cast"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also the converter function may be a little bit more sophisticated to maybe throw errors if we upgrade tendermint lib and it stops working