CHIA-1730: port chia plotnft to @chia_commands framework

[emlowe]

• Port chia plotnft to the @chia_commands framework
• Add many tests to cover chia plotnft flows
• Changed many error conditions to raise an exception that click handles. The error text will display and importantly click will return an "error" exit code. Previously the code printed out some text and just returned. This caused a success exit code
• Added some code to handle earlier cases where users use a wallet ID that is not a pooling wallet. Previous code would error out much later in the process. Now this error is caught upfront before asking the user to continue. Also added an early check if there a no pool wallets period.
• Added some code to handle cases where the wallet ID is not given. In this case, if there is one and only one pool wallet, that wallet will be selected automatically. This makes it easier on the user since they don't always have to specify the wallet id in the simple case of having a single pool wallet. An error will be returned in this case if there are multiple pool wallets. When there are multiple pool wallets the user does need to specify the wallet by id.
• The exception to the above behaviour is when using the plotnft show command. In order to keep backwards behaviour when no wallet_id is provided all pool wallets will be used and basic details about them displayed. This should work identically to previous versions
• Also added in fixes to plotnft code that always generated new puzzlehashes (3 places) - this fix is somewhat unrelated but was surfaced when enabling the reuse parameterization

[coveralls-official]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12036886833

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 575 of 580 (99.14%) changed or added relevant lines in 9 files are covered.
• 23 unchanged lines in 11 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.3%) to 91.461%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
chia/_tests/conftest.py	39	44	88.64%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
chia/util/full_block_utils.py	1	98.17%
chia/_tests/simulation/test_simulation.py	1	96.45%
chia/cmds/plotnft.py	1	98.91%
chia/_tests/pools/test_pool_wallet.py	1	99.04%
chia/server/address_manager.py	1	91.89%
chia/consensus/make_sub_epoch_summary.py	1	98.8%
chia/timelord/timelord.py	2	78.58%
chia/full_node/full_node.py	2	86.51%
chia/_tests/util/full_sync.py	3	88.07%
chia/wallet/wallet_node.py	4	88.18%

Totals
Change from base Build 12036226533:	0.3%
Covered Lines:	104162
Relevant Lines:	113709

---

💛 - Coveralls

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[github-actions]

File	Coverage	Missing Lines
chia/_tests/conftest.py	88.6%	lines 1326-1327, 1329-1330, 1333

Total	Missing	Coverage
580 lines	5 lines	99%

[arvidn]

I think we should aim to have much smaller PRs than this in the future