Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring container build to use CDCgov/cfa-actions/twostep-container-build #167

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gvegayon
Copy link
Member

@gvegayon gvegayon commented Jan 22, 2025

This pull request includes changes to streamline the build process for Docker images and update the Dockerfile reference. The most important changes include renaming and consolidating jobs in the GitHub Actions workflow, and modifying the Dockerfile to reference the correct base image.

Improvements to GitHub Actions workflow:

Updates to Dockerfile:

  • Dockerfile: Changed the base image reference to cfaprdbatchcr.azurecr.io/cfa-epinow2-pipeline:${TAG} to ensure the correct image is used.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Thank you for your contribution @micahwiesner67 🚀! Your pkgdown-site is ready for download 👉 here 👈!
(The artifact expires on 2025-02-21T17:44:33Z. You can re-generate it by re-running the workflow here.)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Additional details and impacted files

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link
Collaborator

@natemcintosh natemcintosh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Slightly confused about the name of the new dependencies image.

.github/workflows/containers-and-az-pool.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/containers-and-az-pool.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Dockerfile Show resolved Hide resolved
@zsusswein
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey George -- wanted to note that I've seen this one and I've been holding off on reviewing pending discussion on CDCgov/cfa-actions#13

@micahwiesner67
Copy link
Collaborator

@zsusswein I think for now we should approve this. The GHA dependence is a larger discussion, and this action doesn't make us more or less dependent on GHA than we were without having these organized into a cfa-actions GHA

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants