Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: property-based scheduling: enable the property-based scheduling experience #744

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

michaelawyu
Copy link
Contributor

Description of your changes

This PR enables the property-based scheduling experience. It also adds additional E2E tests for the experience.

I have:

  • Run make reviewable to ensure this PR is ready for review.

How has this code been tested

  • E2E tests

Special notes for your reviewer

No including all the tests for PR size reasons; additional tests will be submitted in separate PRs.

test/e2e/setup.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/propertyprovider/aks/provider.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ryanzhang-oss
ryanzhang-oss previously approved these changes Apr 4, 2024
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charts/member-agent/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
klog.ErrorS(err, "Failed to auto-discover region for the AKS property provider")
return err
klog.V(2).Info("Setting up the node tracker")
if p.nodeTracker == nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when will the node Tracker be not nil?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, this is for the case where a pricing provider is plugged in directly. Node tracker will be created here in the New function if no pricing provider is provided.

@michaelawyu michaelawyu merged commit 3c13e7d into Azure:main Apr 11, 2024
12 checks passed
@michaelawyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged to unblock the progress; if there's any concern, please let me know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants