Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project 1 Assginments #12

Open
wants to merge 41 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JisooSeo
Copy link

No description provided.

@johnbeve
Copy link
Contributor

Please provide a link in these comments to reviews from your peers.

@JisooSeo
Copy link
Author

Sorry about that! I thought I pushed a pull request from the branch that contained the review comments.

JisooSeo#6

Please provide a link in these comments to reviews from your peers.


- <b>B/Bi</b>: Suppose that B is transitive and Bi is irreflexive. This means that if xBy and yBx hold, xBx holds. It also means that xBix should hold. However, Bi is irreflextive so xBix doesn't hold. Therefore, it does not hold that B is transitive and Bi is irreflexive.

- <b>Bi/A</b>: SSuppose that B is transitive and Bi is irreflexive. Bi being the inverse of B, xBiy implies that yBx. In order to check irreflexivity of B, a reasoner has to loop over B each time it needs to also check for transitivity. This creates a complex role.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo: Double "S" in Suppose

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@johnbeve johnbeve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good, we will be using this work directly in the paper

@@ -0,0 +1,387 @@
<header>
<h1>Project 2: The SPARQL Library of Common Core Ontologies</h1>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've entangled project 2 with project 1..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants