feat: Adding Github Unittests workflow

[lucifercr07]

No description provided.

[Patterbear]

I know this may be the default github action way of doing unit tests, but I originally wrote all the tests with pytest and I feel it was less complicated and more readable, and also because it allows for a variety of tests,.

I personally prefer a more modular, purely functional testing approach, however if @rothoma2 feels unittest and this current format you've used should be the standard, then that's all good and i'll write future tests this way.

Anyway, the actions and the tests look pretty good.

[rothoma2]

I do agree it would be nice to find a way to use pytest, I believe pytest is the standard modern way of doing unit tests in python.

[rothoma2]

Im not very familiar woth force pushes and multiple people on the same branch.

I think normally each one will have its own branch and you will merge one into master and then merge master into branch two before creating the second pullrequest.

In between you can always merge branch A into Branch2 if u need to pull changes into your branch.

[rothoma2]

@lucifercr07 Will you change this back to use pytest, or should we drop this PullRequest? Making sure it doesnt linger for too long.