Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency vitest to ^0.34.0 #70

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: AssietteV2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 20, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
vitest (source) ^0.29.2 -> ^0.34.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v0.34.6

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.34.5

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v0.34.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.34.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.34.2

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v0.34.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.34.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
  • Deprecate deps.registerNodeLoader  -  by @​sheremet-va (7f45b)
    • This option was introduced to support aliasing inside external packages. Please, use deps.optimizer.web instead. If you test Node.js applications, consider adding external packages to server.deps.inline.
    View changes on GitHub

v0.33.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Revert default include patterns  -  by @​so1ve #​3729
    • 0.32.0 changed the default include globs to be compatible with Jest. After a discussion with the community, we are reverting this change because it turned out to be non-intuitive.
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Throw an error, if the module cannot be resolved  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3307 (1ad63)
    • Vitest used to fall back to the original import when it could not resolve it to the file path or the virtual module. This leads to hard-to-find module graph mismatches if you had incorrect alias or relied on relative imports to be resolved to the project root (which is usual behavior in TypeScript) because the code accidentally "worked". With this release, Vitest will now throw an error if it cannot resolve the module - there are possible edge cases that are not covered yet, so if you have any problems with this, please open a separate issue with reproduction.
  • Improve globs  -  by @​nickmccurdy in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3392 (19ecc)
    • Vitest now has glob patterns similar to Jest for better compatibility. It's possible that some files will be considered test files when previously they were not. For example, Vitest now considers test.js to be a test file. Also any file in __tests__ is now considered to be a test, not just files with test or spec suffix.
  • Add @vitest/coverage-v8 package  -  by @​AriPerkkio in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3339 (82112)
    • Vitest now uses v8 code coverage directly for better performance. @vitest/coverage-c8 is deprecated as Vitest no longer uses c8 package for coverage output. It will not be updated anymore, and Vitest will fail in the next version if the user has c8 as their coverage provider. Please, install the new @vitest/coverage-v8 package if you previously used @vitest/coverage-c8.
  • mocker: Don't restore mock to the original if the module is automocked  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3518 (c1004)
    • spy.mockRestore on auto-mocked named exports will no longer restore their implementation to the actual function. This behavior better matches what Jest does.
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
  • Enable experimentalOptimizer  -  by [@​sheremet-va](https://

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for concours-assiette-gourm-hand ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8593ec0
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/concours-assiette-gourm-hand/deploys/66ed6757cfcdb000087789f7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-70--concours-assiette-gourm-hand.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@AndreaBacquele AndreaBacquele changed the base branch from main to AssietteV2 September 30, 2024 18:13
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@AndreaBacquele AndreaBacquele force-pushed the AssietteV2 branch 2 times, most recently from 9092e44 to eb5f569 Compare November 3, 2024 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants