ADD commitment to open licenses #359
Conversation
|
I like it and have quick feedback. Search for commities and replace with communities. “We imagine three audiences….” but there are only two listed below. I feel like this post/policy from 2i2c is also for upstream open source communities. |
|
|
||
| ## We'd love feedback | ||
|
|
||
| We hope that these ideas both clarify our intent and the reason that we think it's important. We'd love feedback about early refinements to these principles in order to make them more effective, as well as ways that we can provide more community oversight and participation in evolving these policies moving forward. If you have any thoughts to share, please send us feedback to `[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought we discontinued this email. Where does this go to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok I'll switch this to ask for an issue in the team compass. I don't know what the recommended way for others to provide feedback would be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@choldgraf I just tested where this goes. i'm not sure but i do know at least it lands on my inbox :D so we can let this be for now - better than team-compass. let's not tweak too much - i just wanted to make sure the email goes somewhere
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| **Acknowledgements**: _The creation of this policy and the rationale behind it was led by [Yuvi Panda](../../../authors/yuvi-panda/) with feedback from 2i2c's team. This blog post was co-written with [Chris Holdgraf](../../../authors/chris-holdgraf)._ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@choldgraf This looks really good and could be a model for others. Thanks for sharing @yuvipanda.
|
Thanks for the feedback and iteration all (and HI CAROL! it is good to see you here :-) ) |
This adds language describing 2i2c's commitment to open technology via policy around licenses we use. Its goal is to provide accountability and transparency for 2i2c, and to clarify how our service differentiates itself on a commitment to open practices and principles. Here are the major changes:
I'd like @yuvipanda to take a look at the language to make sure it is still correct. Please make any suggestions you like.
I'll leave 48 hours for 2i2c's team to raise objections and suggest changes. If after 48 hours there are not objections from more than 2/3 of our staff, or if we get explicit approvals from more than 2/3s of our staff before then (with @yuvipanda having veto authority), I'll merge this post and consider this policy active.