Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #255 from 2i2c-org/networks
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
colliand authored Jun 19, 2024
2 parents 2ee72a3 + 9a74dd2 commit 7af343f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 38 additions and 0 deletions.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
38 changes: 38 additions & 0 deletions content/blog/2024/funding-community-networks/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
---
title: Towards scalable and sustainable networks of community hubs
date: "2024-06-18"
lastmod: "2024-06-18"
authors: ["Chris Holdgraf"]
tags: [sustainability]
categories: [updates]
featured: false
draft: false
---

Over the past several years, 2i2c has built a platform for serving community-centric hubs that provide a digital home for workflows in creating and sharing knowledge.
See [our three-year retrospective](https://2i2c.org/report-czi-2021) for a report about the growth and impact this service has had.

During that time, we've experimented with several models for funding and sustaining this infrastructure.
We've tried everything from direct cost-recovery from individual communities, to institutional contracts that cover several hubs, to grant-based models that fund many communities at the same time.

There are pros and cons associated with each, and we believe that a combination of all of them is important for a long-term service sustainability model for 2i2c.
However, with this post we'd like to share the community funding model that strikes the right balance between short-term sustainability and scalability.

In short: 2i2c aims to serve **networks of communities** that are joined by a domain or workflow, and **fund the network at once** rather than through one-on-one contracts.

{{< figure src="funding-diagram.png" title="A model of the funding and service relationships we aim to build.">}}

We believe that this model strikes a balance between "scalable and very simple hubs" (which require a lot of administrative toil) and "fully bespoke hubs" (which are expensive and unscalable).
By using a single funding contract to serve many communities, we can reduce the amount of sales and contracting toil for each community.
This will let us raise funds more quickly, and focus more of our time on delivering service.

## We are seeking community leaders to collaborate

If you're part of one or more communities that would benefit from cloud infrastructure for creating and sharing knowledge, and believe a network like this would benefit you, please reach out!
We are seeking leaders collaborate in designing service for networks like the ones described above, and identifying potential funding sources for it.

If you're interested in collaborating on this, send an e-mail to [`[email protected]`](mailto:[email protected]).

## Learn more

You can find more information about this fundraising and service strategy in [our Team Compass documentation](https://compass.2i2c.org/partnerships/fundraising/).

0 comments on commit 7af343f

Please sign in to comment.