Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

convert signatures to just use STRUCTURE defintion #143

Open
zippy opened this issue Apr 17, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

convert signatures to just use STRUCTURE defintion #143

zippy opened this issue Apr 17, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@zippy
Copy link
Owner

zippy commented Apr 17, 2016

we want greater optionality in process signatures, but the solution isn't to add that to the whole signature thing, but just to reuse what's already built into structure definitions.
This means defining processes's parameters either with a named structure as the signature (perhaps) with an anonymous structure def. The output signature should similarly just be a symbol.
The current SIGNATURE_PASSTHRU idea also has to be addressed, see #74

@zippy zippy self-assigned this Apr 17, 2016
@zippy zippy added this to the Proto Launch milestone Apr 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant