diff --git a/scripting/index.rst b/scripting/index.rst
index 32b74d9c6..26f500bad 100644
--- a/scripting/index.rst
+++ b/scripting/index.rst
@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ Introduction to Scripting
    basics
    usage
    event-groups
+   optimization
    javascript
diff --git a/scripting/optimization.rst b/scripting/optimization.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..41e94311a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripting/optimization.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+.. _zam:
+
+===================
+Script Optimization
+===================
+
+.. versionadded:: 7.0
+
+.. note::
+
+   ZAM has been available in Zeek for a number of releases, but as of Zeek 7
+   it has matured to a point where we encourage regular users to explore it.
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+The `Zeek Abstract Machine`, "ZAM", is an optional script optimization engine
+built into Zeek. Using ZAM changes the basic execution model for Zeek scripts in
+an effort to gain higher performance.  Normally, Zeek parses scripts into
+abstract syntax trees that it then executes by recursively interpreting each
+node in a given tree.  With ZAM's script optimization, Zeek first compiles the
+trees into a low-level form that it can then generally execute more efficiently.
+
+To enable this feature, include ``-O ZAM`` on the command line.
+
+How much faster will your scripts run?  There's no simple answer to that.  It
+depends heavily on several factors:
+
+* What proportion of the processing during execution is spent in the Zeek core's
+  event engine, rather than executing scripts.  ZAM optimization doesn't help
+  with event engine execution.
+
+* What proportion of the script's processing is spent executing built-in
+  functions (BiFs), i.e., functions callable from the script layer but
+  implemented in native code.  ZAM optimization improves execution for some
+  select, simple BiFs, like :zeek:id:`network_time`, but it doesn't help for
+  complex ones.  It might well be that most of your script processing actually
+  occurs in the underpinnings of the :ref:`logging framework
+  <framework-logging>`, for example, and thus you won't see much improvement.
+
+* Those two factors add up to gains very often on the order of only 10-15%,
+  rather than something a lot more dramatic.
+
+.. note::
+
+   At startup, ZAM takes a few seconds to generate the low-level code for the
+   loaded set of scripts, unless you're using Zeek's `bare mode` (via the
+   ``-b`` command-line option), which loads only a minimal set of scripts. Keep
+   this in mind when comparing Zeek runtimes, to ensure you're comparing only
+   actual script execution time.
+
+To factor out the code-generation phase, you can for example measure the time
+between :zeek:id:`zeek_init` and :zeek:id:`zeek_done` event handlers:
+
+.. code-block:: zeek
+   :caption: runtime.zeek
+
+   global t0: time;
+
+   event zeek_init()
+       {
+       t0 = current_time();
+       }
+
+   event zeek_done()
+       {
+       print current_time() - t0;
+       }
+
+Here's a quick example of ZAM's effect on Zeek's typical processing of a larger
+packet capture, from one of our testsuites:
+
+.. code-block:: sh
+
+   $ zcat 2009-M57-day11-18.trace.gz | zeek -r - runtime.zeek
+   14.0 secs 252.0 msecs 107.858658 usecs
+   $ zcat 2009-M57-day11-18.trace.gz | zeek -O ZAM -r - runtime.zeek
+   12.0 secs 345.0 msecs 857.990265 usecs
+
+A roughly 13% improvement in runtime.
+
+Other Optimization Features
+===========================
+
+You can tune various features of ZAM via additional options to ``-O``, see the
+output of ``zeek -O help`` for details. For example, you can study the script
+transformations ZAM applies, and use ZAM selectively in certain files (via
+``--optimize-files``) or functions (via ``--optimize-funcs``).  Most users
+won't need to use these.