-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PacBio Assemblies stuck at "addNonORFcopy" #48
Comments
Hi, Sorry for the late reply. ISEScan might count two overlapped or nested IS elements as one large IS elements, it depends on the boundaries of the predicted ORF. ISEScan works on any sequence file in FASTA format, one or many sequences in one sequence file. Is there any special sequences in your PacBio assemblies? Zhiqun Xie |
Thank you for your reply. |
Could you share the sequence file with the issue 'addNonORFcopy'? I need to reproduce the error reported with your sequence file. Without reproducing the error, it would be hard to figure out what is the underlining issue. Xie |
Hi Xie, |
Hi Oliva,
I received the fasta file. Just narrowed down the issue to the first contig in the example sequence file. Will figure out the issue and provide you solution.
Best,
Zhiqun Xie
…________________________________
From: olimat17 ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 8:49 PM
To: xiezhq/ISEScan ***@***.***>
Cc: Zhiqun Xie ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [xiezhq/ISEScan] PacBio Assemblies stuck at "addNonORFcopy" (Issue #48)
Hi Xie,
Sorry for the delay in response here. I just sent an example sequence to your listed contact e-mail ***@***.******@***.***>).
For me it doesn't ever give an error, it just gets stuck for hours and never finishes. I am not quite sure why.
Thank you for your help!
-Olivia
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#48 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFKGZMVZKLCW5HFEIWGJY23W6YZ4DANCNFSM6AAAAAAWFPVHPQ>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
The internal algorithm produced the IS element candidates with large number of population each IS element candidate. This caused the huge computing cost when clustering candidates and picking the representative for each cluster. Need to change the internal algorithm to solve this issue in the future. |
Hi Xie, I have come across the same issue as Olivia. Best, |
Hi!
I am running ISEScan on a large set of genome assemblies (consisting primarily of assemblies from Illumina data and a couple PacBio genome assemblies). The tools runs great on the test data and my Illumina assemblies, but the PacBio assemblies seem to get stuck at the "addNonORFcopy" step. (On my server it took the other genomes <30 seconds to finish successfully after the HMM, but on the PacBio assemblies I kill the command after 30 minutes because there is no forward progress).
For a little more context: We anticipate >1000 transposases and predict that it is likely that our observed IS Elements may be overlapping or nested.
Thank you for any help you can provide!
-O
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: