Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Can we generate xbps-src template with this? #15

Open
Animeshz opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Question: Can we generate xbps-src template with this? #15

Animeshz opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Animeshz
Copy link

The tool is really cool, does everything in one go, but writing a xbps-src file is better to maintain it for later version and revisions of an application, it also automates the task to download the archive.

Any guess how can we collect the taken steps (something like with option --dry-run) instead of really packing a deb file into xbps.

@Animeshz Animeshz added bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Mar 18, 2022
@Animeshz
Copy link
Author

Oops, not a bug/help-wanted, its a question, sorry for wrong issue type.

@toluschr
Copy link
Collaborator

A dry-run functionality wouldn't be of much use as one can just read the source-code (Commands do not vary).
As for creating template files, it should be an easy modification:
https://github.com/toluschr/xdeb/blob/master/xdeb#L222-L243

@siduck
Copy link

siduck commented Mar 19, 2022

A dry-run functionality wouldn't be of much use as one can just read the source-code (Commands do not vary). As for creating template files, it should be an easy modification: https://github.com/toluschr/xdeb/blob/master/xdeb#L222-L243

could you add an option to the script for it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants