You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There appears to be a contradiction in the OAuth specifications regarding the case sensitivity of the "Bearer" scheme. While the examples in the Bearer Token Usage specification suggest the token type is case-sensitive as "Bearer," the same specification refers to the HTTP Authentication specification, which clearly states that the scheme is case-insensitive. This inconsistency has created confusion about the expected behavior. The OAuth Working Group has addressed this issue by including a note in the upcoming OAuth 2.1 specification, explicitly clarifying that the token type is case-insensitive. Additionally, the HTTP Semantics specification reaffirms that authentication scheme names are case-insensitive.
Suggested Improvement
Our current implementation treats authorization schemes as case-sensitive, which conflicts with the clarified specifications. To align with these standards and eliminate any ambiguity, we suggest modifying the implementation to treat the authorization schemes such as "Bearer" as case-insensitive. This change will ensure compliance and improve interoperability.
Version
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current Limitation
There appears to be a contradiction in the OAuth specifications regarding the case sensitivity of the "Bearer" scheme. While the examples in the Bearer Token Usage specification suggest the token type is case-sensitive as "Bearer," the same specification refers to the HTTP Authentication specification, which clearly states that the scheme is case-insensitive. This inconsistency has created confusion about the expected behavior. The OAuth Working Group has addressed this issue by including a note in the upcoming OAuth 2.1 specification, explicitly clarifying that the token type is case-insensitive. Additionally, the HTTP Semantics specification reaffirms that authentication scheme names are case-insensitive.
Suggested Improvement
Our current implementation treats authorization schemes as case-sensitive, which conflicts with the clarified specifications. To align with these standards and eliminate any ambiguity, we suggest modifying the implementation to treat the authorization schemes such as "Bearer" as case-insensitive. This change will ensure compliance and improve interoperability.
Version
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: