Call for Consensus: Publish a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot of PNG 3rd Edition

[svgeesus]

This GitHub issue is to establish consensus on publishing a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot. W3C Working Group participants should reply with affirmation, dissent, or may abstain.

Should we publish a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot?

The list of changes since the Candidate Recommendation Draft of 21 January 2025 is up-to-date. The Collections keyword is added, Cosmin has been added as a co-Editor and Phil Harvey as an author, as discussed on the 3 Feb call

Process
Consensus is a core value to the W3C. I have assigned this issue to all PNG WG participants who have their GitHub profile listed.

A WG participant may register a Formal Objection if they would like Team consideration.

WG participants may respond with a simple yes/no, +1/-1 or similar. They may also elaborate. If dissenting, elaboration is encouraged in order to identify issues and find solutions. The W3C process on managing dissent states that we will try to address concerns as much as is reasonable and should move on once that is done.

Call to action
Working group participants should reply with their stance on publishing a Candidate Recommendation Snapshot. If anyone needs more time than 10 working days (ie to Friday 21 Feb) please say so before that time.

[svgeesus]

+1

[chrisn]

Yes

[ctruta]

+1

[ProgramMax]

Yes

[leo-barnes]

Abstain. I'll let @hober and @annevk speak for Apple.

[annevk]

+1

[svgeesus]

@ccameron-chromium @digitaltvguy @palemieux @lrosenthol @hober

[falhassen]

Yes