You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During the last editors' meeting, the question arose of whether restrictOwnAudio should be settable. It seems to me that the best thing to do would be to have getCapabilities() return a sequence<boolean> and let the UA decide whether it supports changing this constraint on the fly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We also don't appear to list restrictOwnAudio in the MediaTrackCapabilities WebIDL which seems like an omission we should fix. I see no reason why this constraint should be omitted there, so this seems editorial to me. It should follow the constrainable pattern like all the other constraints, unless the WG decides otherwise (which I don't believe it has).
As to the OP of whether it is "settable", if we mean can it be applied as a constraint, then it seems like it already can: "As a constraint, this property can be constrained resulting in a source with own audio restriction enabled or disabled."
During the last editors' meeting, the question arose of whether
restrictOwnAudio
should be settable. It seems to me that the best thing to do would be to havegetCapabilities()
return asequence<boolean>
and let the UA decide whether it supports changing this constraint on the fly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: