-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[prfanalyze-visa] _modelpred.nii.gz is identical to generating data #98
Comments
oh sorry about the delay
not a but, we add it for when we didn't need it because it was very time
consuming.
Can you check in your config this option? "obtainPreds": true
if it is not true it will just copy the input
thanks!
Gari
…On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 12:15 PM Gilles de Hollander < ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi again,
When I run the prfanalyze-vista docker on data I generate with prfsynth,
the generated data and the _testdata.nii.gz and _modelpred.nii.gz-files
contain the exact same time series:
Screenshot.2025-02-01.at.12.13.07.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/181733c2-963b-4bb7-b765-5d26acd355d7>
I don't think the predictions of a PRF model look like this? Also, this
obviously doesn't align with the R2s...
Is this a bug?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#98>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCZAV5VZ5OYNTG6ZXWBM632NSUFPAVCNFSM6AAAAABWJF5KCWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSHAZDKMJVGA4DMMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
I used this json
It still returns the input (simulated) BOLD data as |
Thanks, I'll check it out
…On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:57 AM Gilles de Hollander < ***@***.***> wrote:
I used this json
{
"subjectName" : "smallgrid",
"sessionName" : "1",
"solver" : "vista",
"tasks" : "prf",
"isPRFSynthData" : false,
"options": {
"prfprepareAnalysis" : "01",
"hrf": [],
"model" : "one gaussian",
"grid" : false,
"wsearch" : "coarse to fine",
"detrend" : 1,
"keepAllPoints" : false,
"numberStimulusGridPoints": 50,
"obtainPreds": true,
"coarseDecimate": 2
},
"stimulus": {
"stimulus_diameter":20 }
}
It still returns the input (simulated) BOLD data as _modelpred.nii.gz...
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#98 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCZAV7LWBZPRZPJ3SYYTF32PBZW5AVCNFSM6AAAAABWJF5KCWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMNBXGQ4DKMZRGM>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi again,
When I run the
prfanalyze-vista
docker on data I generate withprfsynth
, the generated data and the_testdata.nii.gz
and_modelpred.nii.gz
-files contain the exact same time series:I don't think the predictions of a PRF model look like this? Also, this obviously doesn't align with the R2s...
Is this a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: