Collaborate or merge with TimeRange?

[schwern]

I'm about to publish TimeRange. Our projects are remarkably similar. The goal of TimeRange is to have an object which can iterate by time intervals (not just seconds) without ActiveSupport. I chose a Range subclass because it got lots of features for free. I like your approach of extending Time good as well, but I'd prefer it was optional.

Would you be interested in collaborating and perhaps merging the projects?

[ixti]

Totally cool with that. As it's clear this project is pretty much abandoned, and judging by rubygems.org is not much used anyway. So we cut a release that depends on TimeRange with deprecation warning that people should switch (if anybody still using time iterator)