W2 Discovery: Identify prelim boundaries/expectations/assumptions for Consortium (MVP)

[bevasq]

Objective

• Define preliminary boundaries/expectations/assumptions for Consortium (MVP)

Open Questions

• Does it only focus on governance of content, does it focus on how the whole program is administered and operated, etc.
• For this specific one year contract, how far do we want this to get (which phases will be included: discovery, design, development, launch)
• What questions do we need answered to inform the design of the consortium?

Approach

• Schedule meeting to define "boundaries" of the consortium

Outcome

• Consortium scope is defined, documented and shared

Additional Information

• https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-OPQBWXMbH4SmqSu9iSkv0mBU4RS2Uovuatg2SQI2qg/edit?tab=t.0

[bevasq]

Initial meeting held 11/1. Meeting notes captured here

Action items

1. Frank reached out to Joanie to engage re: consortium; pending response
2. Put together a draft charter of the consortium and circulated to get feedback and participation as part of a DITAP Vendor Day (Becky)
3. Recommend interviewing Joanie, Tracy, Florence, FAI and leads for training providers (Tandem team to draft questions and propose to team)

[bevasq]

Hi @frank-mcnally, have you heard back from Joanie re: Consortium?

[bevasq]

Closing this item per the initial meeting. Added Issue #247 (re: initial charter development) and #248 (re: interview plan development)

Will transfer interview recommendations to future interview issue as direction to get started.