We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem: We need to simplify the "offset" or "raw" servo angles.
Why: There are so many commands for doing the same thing, and they are confusing. [sSerN#V#] [sAngN#V#] [gAng] [gSer]
It's confusing what commands do what.
Does [gIKX#Y#Z#] return angles WITH offset or WITHOUT offset? Does [gFKT#L#R#] expect angles with an offset or no offset?
Solution: I'm not sure. What do you suggest?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[gAng] [sAng] return ideal angles but [gSer] [sSer] return raw angles. idea angle = raw angle + assembly offset So user should alway use ideal angles.
[gIKX#Y#Z#] and [gFKT#L#R#] return ideal angles(with offset).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks for clearing that up. I think the documentation for [gIKX#Y#Z#] and [gFKT#L#R#] should mention that they return ideal angles.
No branches or pull requests
Problem:
We need to simplify the "offset" or "raw" servo angles.
Why:
There are so many commands for doing the same thing, and they are confusing.
[sSerN#V#]
[sAngN#V#]
[gAng]
[gSer]
It's confusing what commands do what.
Does [gIKX#Y#Z#] return angles WITH offset or WITHOUT offset? Does [gFKT#L#R#] expect angles with an offset or no offset?
Solution:
I'm not sure. What do you suggest?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: