You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would be something interesting to do an implementation of.
I have an issue where sometimes peers cannot connect to each other (due to provider-level issues mostly, but I guess firewall situations could happen here too), so something that could help are peers that can serve as a relay (basically, instead of peer1 -> peer2, peer1 -> peer3 -> peer2) to help mitigate these issues.
Tailscale has a solution for this, using their own relay servers. It'd be nice to see something similar on innernet (but maybe not going too as like using TCP, at least for a start, since... that'd surely be a fun thing to do).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is definitely something that is worth adding, totally agree. I think the general strategy as of now is to fix some more basic NAT traversal issues (tracking in #109), and then move on to adding server relays while considering adding support for site-to-site type relays as well.
This would be something interesting to do an implementation of.
I have an issue where sometimes peers cannot connect to each other (due to provider-level issues mostly, but I guess firewall situations could happen here too), so something that could help are peers that can serve as a relay (basically, instead of
peer1 -> peer2
,peer1 -> peer3 -> peer2
) to help mitigate these issues.Tailscale has a solution for this, using their own relay servers. It'd be nice to see something similar on innernet (but maybe not going too as like using TCP, at least for a start, since... that'd surely be a fun thing to do).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: