Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @stylistic/eslint-plugin to v4 (theme) #284

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: theme
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 18, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@stylistic/eslint-plugin (source) 3.1.0 -> 4.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint-stylistic/eslint-stylistic (@​stylistic/eslint-plugin)

v4.1.0

Compare Source

Features
  • add module.exports named export for require(esm) compatibility (#​700) (668c955)
Documentation
Chores

v4.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • indent-binary-ops: handle { for left token check (#​693) (7f2740e)
Chores

v4.0.0

Compare Source

Features
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/theme-major-eslint-stylistic-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 5e5b8df to e37080d Compare February 22, 2025 17:39
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/theme-major-eslint-stylistic-monorepo branch from e37080d to f00bc9b Compare February 26, 2025 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants