You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the UD syntax guidelines, function words (including auxiliaries) should not have dependents. Here's an interesting case from Mila 12b where we violate this principle:
Would we consider this to be a legitimate exception to the rule, or is another analysis possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
According to the UD syntax guidelines, function words (including auxiliaries) should not have dependents. Here's an interesting case from Mila 12b where we violate this principle:
Would we consider this to be a legitimate exception to the rule, or is another analysis possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: