-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
question about resnet18 PIM accuracy #11
Comments
I have the same problem,Do you have any ideas? |
Hi, I am still confusing about this, can we exchange contact for better discussion? You can find my email on my github homepage. |
Hi, I found that the version of MNSIM_Python do not have this problem, you can use that version. |
Well, I find out what is wrong! You should modify this line in quantize.py like this! |
Hi all, many thanks for figuring out this problem, we'll fix the bugs as soon as possible!! |
I am not sure if you use the most recent updated .pth file, you can try to re-download the latest one from the link provided by the authors. |
Hi! This is a very clear and useful tool for relative researchers. However I have some questions when i use this tool.
I used the default given .pth model to test resnet18, the original accuracy is about 86%, however the pim-based result is about 26% without any non-idealties. Can anyone give me some tips?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: