You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If verification of a batch of proofs fails, it is not possible to directly identify which proofs in the batch are invalid. There are cases in which a verifier is likely to want this information.
The most comprehensive approach would introduce two different "verify-with-blame" functions. One would attempt full batch verification; if this fails, it checks each proof in succession and returns a list of all failures. The other would also attempt full batch verification; if this fails, it uses a binary search to return a single failure. The former runs with linear complexity in the size of the batch, while the latter runs with logarithmic complexity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If verification of a batch of proofs fails, it is not possible to directly identify which proofs in the batch are invalid. There are cases in which a verifier is likely to want this information.
The most comprehensive approach would introduce two different "verify-with-blame" functions. One would attempt full batch verification; if this fails, it checks each proof in succession and returns a list of all failures. The other would also attempt full batch verification; if this fails, it uses a binary search to return a single failure. The former runs with linear complexity in the size of the batch, while the latter runs with logarithmic complexity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: