Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

glossary formatting/matching #28

Open
swiftraccoon opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

glossary formatting/matching #28

swiftraccoon opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@swiftraccoon
Copy link
Owner

swiftraccoon commented Dec 3, 2023

fuzzy match on keys?

completely new glossary method?

redesign glossary JSON formatting expectation ?

{
    "GLOSSARY": [
        {
            "keys": ["10-1", "101"],
            "value": "SIGNAL WEAK"
        },
        {
            "keys": ["10-2", "102"],
            "value": "SIGNAL GOOD"
        },
        {
            "keys": ["10-3", "103"],
            "value": "STOP TRANSMITTING"
        },
        {
            "keys": ["10-4", "104"],
            "value": "AFFIRMATIVE"
        },
        // ... continue for each group of signal codes
        {
            "keys": ["C2"],
            "value": "DRUGS"
        }
    ]
}
@swiftraccoon swiftraccoon added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant