You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The episode on citations has not been properly reviewed since 2017 and, in my opinion, entirely lacks depth and clarity. I suggest we work on a new version which imho should:
Offer clearer motivation on why these citation formats exist, and why one "may want to include" one of them, for example summarizing a tiny bit of the linked Software Sustainability Institute blog post, which seems to be a rich resource
Better integrate the section on bibtex with the last sentence, which is unclear and feels dropped from nowhere, and with the new section on CFF which is coming (feature: Adds details on using CITATION.cff #1021)
Do not cite the paper in the code format which draws unnecessary attention
However, it should not become too much longer, since there's always very little time for these smaller, final episodes.
Which part of the content does your suggestion apply to?
How could the content be improved?
The episode on citations has not been properly reviewed since 2017 and, in my opinion, entirely lacks depth and clarity. I suggest we work on a new version which imho should:
code format
which draws unnecessary attentionWhich part of the content does your suggestion apply to?
https://swcarpentry.github.io/git-novice/12-citation.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: