Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lost Agents #1

Open
lukebarnard1 opened this issue Nov 20, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Lost Agents #1

lukebarnard1 opened this issue Nov 20, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@lukebarnard1
Copy link

Agents are sometimes lost when changing scenarios using the monitor.

To repeat this bug, do the following:

  1. Start agentscape server using lib/boot.jar
  2. Run config editor and set the configuration to include 10 non-monitor agents
  3. Hit CTRL+R in the rover config editor
  4. Focus on the monitor and wait for all agents to be loaded
  5. Repeatedly change the scenario and click "Select Scenario"
  6. Eventually, agents will be lost from the table view at the bottom of the monitor, indicating that they have failed to remain connected to the server
@lukebarnard1
Copy link
Author

Possibly related exception:

Agent_1_13 - Got KernelException in connect()
org.iids.aos.kernel.exception.ConnectionSetupException: peer has too many pending virtual connections at the moment
    at org.iids.aos.kernel.mux.ConnectionPort.eventOpenNack(ConnectionPort.java:488) ~[aos-kernel-2.0.0.jar:na]
    at org.iids.aos.kernel.mux.Mux.receivedOpenNack(Mux.java:1085) ~[aos-kernel-2.0.0.jar:na]
    at org.iids.aos.kernel.mux.Mux.access$800(Mux.java:75) ~[aos-kernel-2.0.0.jar:na]
    at org.iids.aos.kernel.mux.Mux$BaseConnectionReaderThread.msgReceived(Mux.java:646) ~[aos-kernel-2.0.0.jar:na]
    at org.iids.aos.kernel.mux.Mux$LoopbackBaseConnectionReaderThread.run(Mux.java:462) ~[aos-kernel-2.0.0.jar:na]

@suegy
Copy link
Owner

suegy commented Dec 1, 2015

This specific error stack is related but not causing agents to drop.
The original issue mentioned was resolved in the latest commit.

@suegy
Copy link
Owner

suegy commented Dec 2, 2015

It seems the problem is still present and needs further evaluation and feedback to pinpoint

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants