Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
Why are you using 0.20 CRDs etc with the 0.19 Operator? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would like to check if the backward compatibility of something like this still works. So does it mean both the versions should always be the same?. If there is any other explanation behind this, would like to listen from you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not really sire I understand what are you doing. Neither Strimzi 0.19 or 0.20 has Zookeeper with TLS sidecars anymore. So I'm not sure where do the odl pods come from. But I doubt it has any relation to the CRD. You will need to check the logs of the pods to see what the problem is. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, so from my above-shown list of pods, my-cluster-zookeeper-0 is something which I am referring to (rest can be ignored for now) and there is a reconciliation error on this pod with a timeout issue. Would like to understand the reason behind this behavior? Zookeeper logs show this.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, this is how the state of the pods is inside my cluster.
So to answer your question, the ones which are seen in running state are still on the 17 version as the reconciliation hasn't started for those yet.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Closing this for now. The answer helps us, thanks Scholzj. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Scholzj,
I found a scenario today while performing compatibility/behavior tests on Kafka. Let me clearly tell you what I have done.
Here is the error message.
Is there any restriction that the reconciliation happens successfully only when the CRD's version matches with the installed deployment operator, in my case it is 20 & 19 respectively.
Please throw some light on this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions