License

[NathanaelA]

I was looking at the licensing on your main home page, to verify its usability (and then all its sub-components, been burned by this before... 😬 ) and you stated you were using animate.css, so I was looking at the site's license for it and it says:

Then I noticed you have a "machine" generated fork of it here that you are directly using, rather than directly linking to animate.css.

This appear to be a interesting grey/gray area here on what the license should be... (IANAL, but I believe that all derivatives should be under the same source license.) --- Have you perhaps received permission from them to re-license the animate.css code since you are directly using there CSS (which is under the Hippocratic License) to generate your CSS which you are putting under the MIT license?

[NathanaelA]

Hmm, doing a little bit more research -- it appears that the version on NPM (v4 and all older versions) are all MIT, so no concern on the version you are using, which is awesome news. 😀

They have updated the license on the website, but only the newest code in github and the apparently when v5 is released will be under the Hippocratic License. animate-css/animate.css#1516

You might just have to stay on v4 or see if you can get permission to continue using v5 under MIT...