From e8cffafa8a5fc0b823f4bd8facd1c805da5c3007 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shlomi Fish Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:22:11 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] add links to really bad langs --- lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt | 5 +++ .../index.xhtml.tt2 | 37 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt b/lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt index 8d58092089..c365cfbe89 100644 --- a/lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt +++ b/lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt @@ -12102,10 +12102,15 @@ wml -O2 5's +BANCStar +BobX Checklist Euler630 +INTERCAL +Malbolge OOP PyPy +WTF cpython ghc goto diff --git a/src/philosophy/computers/your-programming-language-must-suck/index.xhtml.tt2 b/src/philosophy/computers/your-programming-language-must-suck/index.xhtml.tt2 index c29079f406..b17044afcd 100644 --- a/src/philosophy/computers/your-programming-language-must-suck/index.xhtml.tt2 +++ b/src/philosophy/computers/your-programming-language-must-suck/index.xhtml.tt2 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ skimming code (even without syntax highlighting).

I could have gone -on, but I think I got my message across. Thing is, when designing a programming +on, but I think I got my message across. The point is, when designing a programming language, you need to make a lot of design decisions - what to include, what to exclude, etc. However, many of these design decisions are not 100% advantages or 100% disadvantages, but in fact trade-offs, and many people will question @@ -161,6 +161,41 @@ list of links and quotations on my wiki, about the more general, non-programming +[% WRAPPER h3_section id = "especially-bad-langs" title = "Some especially bad languages" %] + +

+ +[%- END -%] + [%- END -%] [% PROCESS cc_by_licence_section year = "2011", %]