You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for reporting this. As /by is a valid, repeat takes it as an alternative tag for the recurring command too. This is something we forgot to document in the user guide, and could be a feature the team could be adding in the future versions.
Besides, the team will be reducing the severity to be LOW, as the program still works normally, and the new repeat task is added correctly. Since /by is an invalid tag in repeat, it can be assumed that the user wants to loop it every 123213 (which is a short-cut instead of writing "every").
Items for the Tester to Verify
❓ Issue response
Team chose [response.NotInScope]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: Thank you for your statement. However, /by should be stated within the documentation as an additional flag that can be accepted if it was so.
❓ Issue severity
Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.Medium]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Expected to use /every flag for the recurrence basis, however, /by is accepted as well
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: