You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When "literal generalization" derivation steps are made, they depend on the dependencies of used theorems. This requires theorem proofs to be executed in a specific order, unlike any other derivation step. Right now we see this when doing a clean build -- it chokes at "qpe_precision_guarantee" because other QPE theorems must be executed first. I've been dealing with this manually. This specific issue will be fixed when "conservative definitions" are implemented and pulled into the master branch. It will use "conservative definitions" instead of "literal generalization". However, "literal generalization" could still have useful applications in the future, so we still need to address this issue eventually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When "literal generalization" derivation steps are made, they depend on the dependencies of used theorems. This requires theorem proofs to be executed in a specific order, unlike any other derivation step. Right now we see this when doing a clean build -- it chokes at "qpe_precision_guarantee" because other QPE theorems must be executed first. I've been dealing with this manually. This specific issue will be fixed when "conservative definitions" are implemented and pulled into the master branch. It will use "conservative definitions" instead of "literal generalization". However, "literal generalization" could still have useful applications in the future, so we still need to address this issue eventually.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: