Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forcing monotonicity #6

Open
hanslovsky opened this issue Nov 17, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Forcing monotonicity #6

hanslovsky opened this issue Nov 17, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@hanslovsky
Copy link
Contributor

Forcing monotonicity is a great idea but will fail at the current state if for any integer number less or equal to the comparison range, all samples violate the monotonicity constraint. In this case no support for the fit is present and, therefore, an exception is thrown during estimation.

To overcome this, we should reconsider monotonicity enforcement:

  1. Omit it completely
  2. Leave it as is with an adaptive range or filling in values for which no support is present
  3. Enforce monotonicity only on the fit, not on the samples that contribute to the fit.

Going with 3 in combination with an adaptive range makes the most sense to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant