You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation advertises that this "respects RFC 4180 for the output CSV format", but as discussed in #27 the RFC specifies CRLF for line separators while this library defaults to LF.
The RFC indicates implementations will vary, but that they should "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others" so I'd interpret a writer that deviates from this to not be compliant.
I don't know how feasible changing the default would at this point, but I think at least adding a caveat to the documentation would be helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The documentation advertises that this "respects RFC 4180 for the output CSV format", but as discussed in #27 the RFC specifies CRLF for line separators while this library defaults to LF.
The RFC indicates implementations will vary, but that they should "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others" so I'd interpret a writer that deviates from this to not be compliant.
I don't know how feasible changing the default would at this point, but I think at least adding a caveat to the documentation would be helpful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: