Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

custom_derive is unmaintained #2199

Open
jayvdb opened this issue Jan 18, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

custom_derive is unmaintained #2199

jayvdb opened this issue Jan 18, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor

jayvdb commented Jan 18, 2025

https://crates.io/crates/custom_derive is unmaintained. Last release was Nov 2016.

It seems fairly clear that maintainer Daniel Keep would not object to it being declared as unmaintained.

The crate description include

(Note: superseded by macro-attr)

Crate repository links to branch https://github.com/DanielKeep/rust-custom-derive/tree/custom_derive-master

https://crates.io/crates/macro_attr is by the same author, and is what is currently at the repo https://github.com/DanielKeep/rust-custom-derive , and hasnt been touched since Nov 2016. The tests currently fail - PRs to fix this exist.

Since Dec 2018, @DanielKeep has only had two activity on github.

The transition from custom_derive to macro-attr is fairly easy, e.g. DanielKeep/rust-conv#14 and https://gitlab.com/antonok/enum_dispatch/-/merge_requests/44

Those two PRs are for the two crates which are the most popular usages of custom_derive on https://crates.io/crates/custom_derive/reverse_dependencies

Crate https://crates.io/crates/conv is also by Daniel Keep, so that would be the next one which may need to be flagged as unmaintained

@jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor Author

jayvdb commented Jan 18, 2025

I have emailed Daniel Keep advising him of this issue and DanielKeep/rust-conv#14 as the most important PR to be merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant