We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm wondering if the fact that:
10.b(16) != "10".b(16)
represents an inconsistency in the design of Radix? FYI,
10.b(16).to_i => 10 "10".b(16).to_i => 16
The reason is at least understandable. 10 is already a base-10 representation, where as "10", being a string, has no implicit base.
10
"10"
I suppose there may be no other way to handle it, but it does seem like a source of confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I'm wondering if the fact that:
represents an inconsistency in the design of Radix? FYI,
The reason is at least understandable.
10is already a base-10 representation, where as"10", being a string, has no implicit base.I suppose there may be no other way to handle it, but it does seem like a source of confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: